SELF-ACTUALIZATION NEEDS
05. SELF-ACTUALIZATION NEEDS
The aforementioned theory may be applied to
the roles of organizational cultural and human resource
management in improving employee’s performance
despite some criticism or limitations of the theory. While some research has
shown support for Maslow’s theory, others have not been able to substantiate
the idea of a needs hierarchy that is considered to be influenced by Western
culture, and thus cannot apply to all scenarios (Richard, 2000)
There was little
evidence for Maslow's ranking of these needs and even less evidence that these
needs are in a hierarchical order.
Maslow's biographical analysis focused on a
biased sample of self-actualized individuals, predominately limited to highly
educated white males such as Thomas Jefferson, Abraham Lincoln, Albert
Einstein, William James, Aldous Huxley, Gandhi, Beethoven. Although Maslow
(1970) did study self - actualized females, such as Eleanor Roosevelt and
Mother Teresa, they comprised a small proportion of his sample. This makes
it difficult to generalize his theory to females and individuals from lower
social classes or different ethnicity. Thus, questioning the population
validity of Maslow's findings (Grampy,2016).
The hierarchy of needs theory is relevant to
this study as the theory is applicable to organizational orientation and
employee motivation (Greenberg & Baron, 2003). They further argue that the
theory is able to suggest how managers can lead their employees or subordinates
to become self-actualized. The idea implies the dual role of the theory first
to organizations and second to employees on the basis that both the
organization and the employees must decide on the performance of their
organization, and that when employees put in their best in the service of the
organization, the culture and human resource practice should also ensure that
the employees’ level of needs are reflected in the values the organization
holds with high esteem (Greenberg & Baron, 2003).
In conclusion, problems noted with Dr.
Maslow’s work are primarily empirical. Although he saw the need for future,
objective studies, he initially viewed his pursuits as a way to “convince and
to teach” himself, “rather than to prove or to demonstrate to others”. Reading
this study would lead one to believe that the self-actualized person is
untouchable and beyond reproach. However, Maslow has a way of detaching the SA
individuals and then slowing allowing them back down to earth. He identified
several positive factors but also explained the Self-actualized are not
perfect, invariably bringing back the “human part” of this humanistic view of
psychology. (Huber, et.al, 2000)
The wide popularity and applicability of
Maslow’s theory is attributed to its simplicity and ease of application.
However, counter-evidence paved the way for criticisms. Thus, this section aims
to shed light on some of these limitations, namely:
1. deprivation/domination,
2. gratification/activation,
3. self-actualization (Fallatah and Syed,2018)
Indeed, it is the limited empirical evidence
of the universality of Maslow’s model which should be of particular concern to
researchers of motivation. Satisfaction is a relative concept which differs
from person to person and context to context. Therefore, it is imperative that
such researchers undertake empirical verification of Maslow’s hierarchical
order of needs in diverse national, industrial and organisational contexts.
This is important given that the majority of the empirical studies on Maslow,
which have actually been undertaken, have been done in Western organisations
and contexts. Therefore, it would be beneficial for there to be a future focus
on organisations which are located in developing and underdeveloped countries
(Fallatah and Syed,2018)
Conclusion
Regardless of these criticisms, Maslow’s
hierarchy of needs represents part of an important shift in psychology. Rather
than focusing on abnormal behavior and development, Maslow's humanistic psychology was focused on the development of
healthy individuals. While there was relatively little research -supporting the
theory, the hierarchy of needs is well-known and popular both in and out
of psychology. (Gans,2018).
This is not always the case, and therefore
Maslow's hierarchy of needs in some aspects has been
Falsified. Through examining cultures in which
large numbers of people live in poverty (such as India) it is clear that people
are still capable of higher order needs such as love and belongingness However,
this should not occur, as according to Maslow, people who have difficulty
achieving very basic physiological needs (such as food, shelter etc.) are not
capable of meeting higher growth needs (Grampy,2016).
Also, many creative people, such as authors
and artists (e.g. Rembrandt and Van Gough)
lived in poverty throughout their lifetime,
yet it could be argued that they achieved self-actualization (Mcleod, 2007)
As Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs proposes a
powerful means to motivation in which higher level needs, such as esteem and
self-actualization be designed and implemented for motivation, it was
additionally employed to devise motivational mechanics for CEOs, seniors and
directors of management corporations (Senter ,2004).
List of References
.
Fallatah, M. and
Syed,J.(2018) Employee Motivation in Saudi Arabia:An Investigation into the
Higher Education Sector.
Huber, R. J., Edwards, C. & Fleming-Boyton, D. (2000) Cornerstones of psychology, readings in the history of psychology. The current science. (pp. 291-318). Australia: Wadsworth, Thomas Learning Inc.
Greenberg, J., and Baron, R. A.(
2003). Behavior in Organizations: Understanding and Managing the Human
Side of Work. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice
Huber, R. J., Edwards, C. & Fleming-Boyton, D. (2000) Cornerstones of psychology, readings in the history of psychology. The current science. (pp. 291-318). Australia: Wadsworth, Thomas Learning Inc.
Maslow, A. H.
(1970a). Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper & Row
McLeod, S. A. (2007). Maslow's Hierarchy of
Needs
Richard, O. 2000. Racial
diversity, business strategy, and firm performance. Academy of
Management Journal, 43: 164 –177.
Senter, A. (2004). An
Embarrassment of Riches. Director, 58(4), 96.
Hi Ruwanga , Your blog has stated how is apply Maslow's hierarchy theory to the organization. thus Maslow proposed that if people grew up in an environment in which their needs are not meet, they would be unlikely to function healthy, well-adjusted individuals. Research testing Maslow’s theory has supported the distinction between the deficiencies and growth needs but showed that not all people are able to satisfy their higher-order needs on the job. According the results of the research managers from higher echelons of organizations are able to satisfy both their growth and deficiency needs lower level managers are able to satisfy only their deficiency needs on the job. Maslow’s theory has not received a great deal of support with respect to specific notion it proposes (Greenberg &Baron 2003, p195). To them this model is theorized to
ReplyDeletebe especially effective in describing the behavior of individuals who are high in
growth need strength because employees who are different to the idea of increasing
their growth will not realize any physiological reaction to their jobs (Avneet , 2013)
Hi Ajantha! Thank you for your comments and yes indeed the subject theory emphasizes on basic human needs in a psychological point of view. and taken as a reference most firms are motivating their employees based on the theory for better performance and productivity (Armstrong 2006).
DeleteAlthough Maslow’s hierarchy of need was originally developed with a more psychological perspective in the study of human behavior, the theory has been successfully applied to motivate their employees in a human resource management perspective in almost any organization with a common objective. (Jerome,2013)
ReplyDeleteAs the blog comprehensively explains, The subject theory is based on basic human needs to more complex needs where to be addressed in each and every level and to succeed from the bottom to the peak of the pyramid to archive “self-actualization”. Whereas in reality achievers of that caliber could only be a handful (Armstrong and Taylor, 2014).
Thanks Chaminda!
DeleteHowever the critics argue that that the theory makes the unrealistic assumptions about employees in general that all employees are alike, all situations are alike and that there is only one best way to meet needs (Kaur, 2013).
Great read Ruwanga. However, Kaur (2013) says that Maslow has proposed that if people grew up in an environment in which their needs are not met, they would be unlikely to function healthy and well-adjusted individuals. Research testing in Maslow’s theory has supported the difference between the deficiencies and growth needs but showed that not all are able to satisfy their higher-order needs on the job. Accordingly, the results of the research highlight that managers from higher echelons of organizations are able to satisfy both growth and deficiency needs but lower level managers are only able to satisfy their deficiency needs on the job.
ReplyDeleteThanks Berni, I agreed to the point and its very clear that this theory has been criticized and I fount following solution for the same. Its Total reward system.
DeleteTotal reward describes a reward strategy that brings components such as learning and development together with aspects of the work environment, into the benefits package. In the total reward system both tangible and intangible rewards are considered valuable. Tangible rewards arise from transactions between the employer and employee and include rewards such as pay, personal bonuses and other benefits. Intangible rewards have to do with learning, development and work experience. Examples of these types of rewards are opportunity to develop, recognition from the employer and colleagues, personal achievement and social life. The aim of total reward is to maximize the positive impact that a wide range of rewards can have on motivation, job engagement and organizational commitments. The components of the total rearward can be described as in the following figure.
(Armstrong & Brown, 2006, p.22).
From Udeni
ReplyDeleteHi Ruwanga, our exploration and application of Maslow Hierarchy of need theory for any business organization constructively applied and defined. But little suggestion to be included in your assignment. Application of Herzberg's motivation and Hygiene theory extended the work of Maslow and has proposed with two important incidents at their job.
1. When did you feel particularly good about your job
2.When did you feel exceptionally bad about your job? He used the critical incidents method of obtain data. So motivation and Hygiene factors specially considered. The opposite of satisfaction is not dissatisfaction. The underlying reason, he says is that removal of dissatisfying characteristics from a job does not necessarily make the job satisfying. He believes in the existence of a dual continuum. The opposite of satisfaction is 'no satisfaction' and the opposite of dissatisfaction is 'no dissatisfaction'. So you may have to show how this application should be done specially in planning and controlling of employees work.
Hi Udeni,
DeleteThanks a lot for your valuable adding to my blog and it makes. In an organization satisfied to 100% is not realistic. Maslow’s theory is a general understanding needs of a basic human being in the study of human behavior in a psychological aspect. Therefore it is up to the thinking to implement a strategic human resource management (SHRM) with a mix of relevant theories which fits the most to its culture and objectives (Armstrong and Taylor, 2014)
Good Read Ruwanga. You have clearly identified the importance of employee commitment towards the workforce. Therefore it is further confirmed that it helps employee to manage their performance effectively by achieving set goals and objectives.
ReplyDeleteThere is very effective view which is, Leadership entails the creation of vision about a desired future state which seeks to enmesh all members of an organization in its net. As stated earlier by ‘Flapper’, ‘Fortunie’ and ‘Stoop’ (1996.27), Performance management systems ensure that, all noses are pointing in the same direction." If the direction is undecided, the performance management system is rendered useless as it will merely monitor the disjointed daily activities of the employees and not the performance of an organization as a whole.